Olympus viewer 3 vs lightroom manual#
Olympus viewer 3 vs lightroom pro#

100% FOV coverage and 1.48x magnification Viewfinder: XGA OLED electronic viewfinder with 2,360k dots, approx.Shutter Speeds: 1/8000s to 60 seconds, 1/16000s with electronic shutter.Continuous shooting: 10 fps (AF-S), 5 fps (AF-C).Autofocus: Contrast detection AF with 81 autofocus areas.Weatherproof: Yes (Splash, dust and freeze proof down to -10☌).

Sensor: 16 megapixel Micro Four Thirds Live Mos.

In this second chapter, I will add some extra thoughts about topics I’ve already covered, mention the more relevant differences between the mark II and the first E-M5, and concentrate on other things such as overall image quality, autofocus performance and the overall feel of using it for the second time. You can also read our E-M5 II vs E-M1 comparison.

In the first chapter, I wrote about the design/ergonomics, the new High Res Mode, the improved 5-axis stabilisation and video mode. the two new lenses) was an excellent way to give it a second evaluation. Using it regularly like it was my own camera while concentrating on other things (i.e.

Olympus viewer 3 vs lightroom pro#

When Olympus sent us the new 8mm and 7-14mm Pro lenses, I asked if an E-M5 II was available so that I could use it during my three-week trip to Canada. Indeed, it is something we’d like to do with every camera we test here at MirrorLessons. It is also an opportunity to reconsider one’s first impressions after reading feedback from other users. Being among the first to review a new product has its obvious advantages, but it is nice to come back to it a second time to check other aspects I didn’t have time to test in the first place. I had the chance to test it before its official announcement and as such, I decided to concentrate on the many new features that camera has to offer.

Olympus viewer 3 vs lightroom manual#

I've tried creating manual profiles in LR to match the output that I get in Viewer (E-520, natural, -1 sat, -1 contrast), but to no avail.ĭoes anyone have a better solution to this workflow? I would like to keep the colours 'out-of-the-box' but wish to have the ease of use of LR and its organisational power for future processing of non-destructive workflow.Five months have passed since my first review of the OM-D E-M5 mark II. The main reason why I still use Viewer to process the raw files instead of using the one-stop LR solution is due to the Olympus JPEG colours that drew me to the system in the first place. End result - I have ORF and JPEG files, but no trace of the edits along the way (LR has the history function, but I've long deleted the transient TIFF files after use). Due to the size of the TIFF files produced, once I produce the desired JPEG files and copy them into albums, I'll delete the TIFF files.

I normally only adjust WB in Viewer (it's really much easier than in LR for me), and reduce sharpening to -2 for (IMO) better sharpening algorithms later in LR.Įdits in LR normally involve tilting/cropping/sharpening/exposure. I shoot in raw and use Viewer to produce TIFF files that I further process in Lightroom. I'm currently having problems streamlining my workflow from raw to JPEG, and would like to hear from others here who may help me.